4.5 Article

Tumor necrosis factor alpha disrupts tight junction assembly

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH
卷 116, 期 1, 页码 14-18

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-4804(03)00311-1

关键词

tight junction; Crohn's disease; occludin; ZO-1; claudin; tumor necrosis factor alpha

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. We have previously shown an increase in intestinal permeability and a corresponding decrease in the expression of tight junction (TJ) proteins in the intestines of patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha) has been implicated in the inflammatory process of CD and its suppression has therapeutic benefit. ZO-1, occludin, and the claudins are key proteins in the TJ. Hypothesis: TNFalpha disrupts the TJ. Materials and methods. AIDCK cells were incubated with TNFalpha (0-100 ng/ml) for 5 days. Qualitative evaluation of the TJ was done with monoclonal antibody to ZO-1 detected by an immunofluorescence. Duplicate cells were lysed and ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-1 amount determined by western blot. Results. Immunofluorescent staining of MDCK cells for ZO-1 showed TJ structural disruption with increasing amount of TNFa characterized by fragmented staining of ZO-1. There were no significant differences in quantitation of ZO-1 or occludin in the AIDCK cells for all TNFalpha concentrations. There was a significant decrease in the amount of claudin-1 with increasing concentration of TNFalpha. Conclusions. (1) AMCK Us are qualitatively disrupted by TNFalpha. (2) This disruption is not because of a decrease in cell number, lack of cell layer confluency, or a decrease in the amount of ZO-1 or occludin. (3) The amount of claudin-1 present in the cell is decreased with increasing amounts of TNFa suggesting that the lack of claudin-1 may cause a relocation of ZO-1 away from the TJ. (4) This rearrangement may play a role in the increased intestinal permeability seen in CD and other diseases. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据