4.5 Article

Iron deficiency and risk factors for lower iron stores in 6-24-month-old New Zealanders

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 58, 期 1, 页码 71-79

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601751

关键词

iron status; children; ferritin; anaemia; New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of biochemical iron deficiency and identify factors associated with ferritin levels among 6-24-month-old urban South Island New Zealand children. Design: Cross-sectional survey conducted from May 1998 to March 1999. Setting: The cities of Christchurch, Dunedin and Invercargill. Subjects: A total of 323 randomly selected 6-24-month-old children participated (response rate 61%) of which 263 provided a blood sample. Methods: A complete blood cell count, zinc protoporphyrin, serum ferritin and C-reactive protein were measured on nonfasting venipuncture blood samples, 3-day weighed food records and general questionnaire data were collected. Results: Among children with C-reactive protein <10 mg/l (n = 231), 4.3% had iron deficiency anaemia, 5.6% had iron deficiency without anaemia, and 18.6% had depleted iron stores, when a ferritin cutoff of <= 12 g/l was used. Age (negative), sex (girls > boys), ethnicity (Caucasian > non-Caucasian), weight-for-age percentiles (negative) and birth weight (positive) were associated with ferritin after adjusting for infection and socioeconomic status. When current consumption of iron fortified formula and >500 ml of cows' milk per day were included, these were associated with a 22% increase and 25% decrease in ferritin, respectively (R-2 = 0.28). Conclusions: The presence of suboptimal iron status (29%) among young New Zealand children is cause for concern, even though severe iron deficiency is rare, because children with marginal iron status are at risk of developing severe iron deficiency if exposed to a physiological challenge. Sponsorship: Health Research Council of New Zealand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据