4.0 Article

Endothelial cells modulate osteogenesis in calcifying vascular cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 193-201

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000077394

关键词

vascular calcification; endothelial cells; collagen; matrix GLA protein; bone morphogenetic protein

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [K08HL004270] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL04270] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The potential role of vascular endothelium in atherosclerotic calcification is unknown. Endothelial cells (EC) express bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), and EC-conditioned medium is osteoinductive in marrow stromal cells. To test whether EC are osteoinductive in vascular cells, we used calcifying vascular cells (CVC) that form nodules and mineralize in vitro. We established a coculture model with EC grown opposite CVC on membranes coated with collagen I or collagen IV, both of which are expressed in atherosclerotic lesions. On collagen I, EC did not alter CVC nodule formation, calcification or expression of the osteogenic marker Cbfa1, the chondrogenic marker collagen IX or smooth muscle cell alpha-actin. However, on collagen IV, EC abolished nodule formation and calcification, and expression of cell markers decreased, suggesting dedifferentiation. Matrix GLA protein (MGP), also expressed in atherosclerotic lesions, was added to CVC in coculture. Unexpectedly, MGP enhanced Cbfa1 expression in CVC on both collagen I and IV. The enhancement was most apparent on collagen IV, where calcification also increased. However, MGP did not restore nodule formation on collagen IV, suggesting that nodule formation and cell differentiation are separate processes. The effect of EC on CVC calcification was suppressed by noggin, an inhibitor of BMP activity, and in part mimicked by replacement of EC by BMP-2. Our results support a role for endothelium in vascular calcification, modulated by collagens and MGP. Copyright (C) 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据