4.5 Article

The effects of patient age on human osteoblasts' response to Ti-6Al-4V implants in vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 30-38

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1016/S0736-0266(03)00155-4

关键词

osteoblast; implant; aging; gender; mineralization; sex

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Osseointegrated implants are a common therapy for the elderly population as lifespan increases. Understanding the effects of age and sex on osseointegration is important for successful implant therapy. Therefore, the response of primary human osteoblasts (HOB) to implant materials was studied. HOBs were obtained by outgrowth of cells from bone from orthopaedic procedures and categorized as Young (Y), <15; Middle (M), 30-50; and Old (0), >60 years old. Initially the HOB phenotype was determined on tissue culture plastic. Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining and activity were significantly increased in HOBs from older patients. Message levels of type I collagen (COL), bone sialoprotein (BSP) and ALP were significantly higher (from 2.3- to 3.8-fold) in Y subjects compared to M and 0 patients at 2 weeks. Studies of the response of HOBs to implant materials were undertaken using Ti-6Al-4V disks prepared in a manner similar to orthopaedic implants. A 1.4-fold (p < 0.05) increase in cell attachment was found in HOBs from Y compared with 0 in female subjects but not in male subjects. Cell proliferation at 24 h was not significantly different by age or sex, nor was DNA content different at 2 and 4 weeks. Mineralization in HOB-implant cultures was 2.3-fold higher in Y than in 0, and 1.7-fold higher in Y compared to M HOBs from female but not male subjects at 4 weeks. Northern blot and RT-PCR analysis at 2 weeks of culture showed significantly higher levels (1.6-2.3-fold) of COL, BSP, and osteocalcin (OC) mRNAs in Y HOBs compared to M and 0 HOBs from female subjects. We conclude that human osteoblasts from older female patients have a decreased ability to form bone on implants. (C) 2003 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据