4.7 Article

Maltose is the major form of carbon exported from the chloroplast at night

期刊

PLANTA
卷 218, 期 3, 页码 474-482

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-003-1128-y

关键词

carbon export; chloroplast; glucose; maltose; starch degradation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transitory starch is formed in chloroplasts during the day and broken down at night. We investigated carbon export from chloroplasts resulting from transitory-starch breakdown. Starch-filled chloroplasts from spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv. Nordic IV) were isolated 1 h after the beginning of the dark period and incubated for 2.5 h, followed by centrifugation through silicone oil. Exported products were measured in the incubation medium to avoid measuring compounds retained inside the chloroplasts. Maltose and glucose made up 85% of the total exported products and were exported at rates of 626 and 309 nmol C mg(-1) chlorophyll h(-1), respectively. Net export of phosphorylated products was less than 5% and higher maltodextrins were not detected. Maltose levels in leaves of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Linden), spinach, and Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. were low in the light and high in the dark. Maltose levels remained low and unchanged during the light/dark cycle in two starch-deficient Arabidopsis mutants, stf1, deficient in plastid phosphoglucomutase, and pgi, deficient in plastid phosphoglucoisomerase. Through the use of nonaqueous fractionation, we determined that maltose was distributed equally between the chloroplast and cytosolic fractions during darkness. In the light there was approximately 24% more maltose in the cytosol than the chloroplast. Taken together these data indicate that maltose is the major form of carbon exported from the chloroplast at night as a result of starch breakdown. We hypothesize that the hydrolytic pathway for transitory-starch degradation is the primary pathway used when starch is being converted to sucrose and that the phosphorolytic pathway provides carbon for other purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据