4.6 Article

An evaluation of the ability of pifithrin-alpha and to inhibit -beta function in two wild-type p53 human tumor cell lines

期刊

MOLECULAR CANCER THERAPEUTICS
卷 4, 期 9, 页码 1369-1377

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0341

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The small-molecule compound pifithrin-alpha (PFT-alpha) has been reported to inhibit p53 function and protect against a variety of genotoxic agents. We show here that PFT-alpha is unstable in tissue culture medium and is rapidly converted to its condensation product PFT-beta. Both compounds showed limited solubility with PFT-alpha precipitating out of tissue culture medium at concentrations > 30 mu mol/L. PFT-alpha and -beta exhibited cytotoxic effects in vitro towards two human wild-type p53-expressing tumor cell lines, A2780 ovarian and HCT116 colon (IC50 values for both cell lines were 21.3 +/- 8.1 mu mol/L for PFT-alpha and 90.3 +/- 15.5 mu mol/L for PFT-beta, mean +/- SD, n = 4). There was no evidence of protection by clonogenic assay with either compound in combination with ionizing radiation. Indeed, there was some evidence that PFT-alpha enhanced cytotoxicity, particularly at higher concentrations of PFT-alpha. Neither compound had any effect on p53, p21, or MDM-2 protein expression following ionizing radiation exposure and there was no evidence of any abrogation of p53-dependent, ionizing radiation -induced cell cycle arrest. Similarly, there was no evidence of cellular protection, or of effects on p53-dependent gene transcription, or on translation of MDM-2 or p21 following UV treatment of these human tumor cell lines. In addition, there was no effect on p53 or p21 gene transactivation or p38 phosphorylation after UV irradiation of NIH-3T3 mouse fibroblasts. In conclusion, neither PFT-alpha nor -beta can be regarded as a ubiquitous inhibitor of p53 function, and caution should be exercised in the use of these agents as specific p53 inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据