4.7 Review

Reactive oxygen species as mediators of calcium signaling by angiotensin II: Implications in vascular physiology and pathophysiology

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS & REDOX SIGNALING
卷 7, 期 9-10, 页码 1302-1314

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/ars.2005.7.1302

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide anion, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radical, and reactive nitrogen species, such as nitric oxide and peroxynitrite, are biologically relevant O-2 derivatives increasingly being recognized as important in vascular biology through their oxidation/reduction (redox) potential. All vascular cell types produce ROS primarily via membrane-associated NAD(P)H oxidase. ROS influence vascular function by modulating contraction/dilation, cell growth, apoptosis/anoikis, migration, inflammation, and fibrosis. An imbalance in redox state where prooxidants overwhelm antioxidant capacity results in oxidative stress. Oxidative excess and associated oxidative damage are mediators of altered vascular tone and structural remodeling in many cardiovascular diseases. ROS elicit these effects by influencing intracellular signaling events. In addition to modulating protein tyrosine kinases, protein phosphatases, mitogen-activated protein kinases, and transcription factors, ROS are important regulators of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and RhoA/Rho kinase signaling. ROS increase vascular [Ca2+], by stimulating inositol trisphosphate-mediated Ca2+ mobilization, by increasing cytosolic Ca2+ accumulation through sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase inhibition, and by stimulating Ca2+ influx through Ca2+ channels. Increased ROS generation enhances Ca2+ signaling and up-regulates RhoA/Rho kinase, thereby altering vascular contractility and tone. The present review discusses the importance of ROS in angiotensin II signaling in vascular biology and focuses specifically on the role of oxidative stress in Ca2+ signaling in the vasculature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据