4.5 Article

Studying the immunosuppressive role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase: tryptophan metabolites suppress rat allogeneic T-cell responses in vitro and in vivo

期刊

TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 95-100

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.00031.x

关键词

indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; immunologic tolerance; immunosuppression; kynurenine; tryptophan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pregnancy is a natural model of successful tolerance induction against allogeneic tissues. Recent studies pointed to a role of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), a tryptophan-degrading enzyme expressed in the placenta, in mediation of T-cell suppression. We want to apply to organ transplantation what nature has developed for suppression of fetal rejection during pregnancy. Here we analyze whether IDO-induced tryptophan metabolites are able to suppress the allogeneic T-cell response and allograft rejection in rats. Rat lymphocytes were stimulated with allogeneic dendritic cells in vitro in the presence of increasing amounts of tryptophan metabolites (kynurenine, 3-hydroxykynurenine, anthranilic acid, 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid and quinolinic acid) and T-cell proliferation was determined. The findings showed that kynurenine, 3-hydroxykynurenine and 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid strongly suppress the T-cell response, whereas anthranilic and quinolinic acid are noneffective. Vital staining of cells with subsequent fluorescence-activated cell sorter analyses demonstrated that suppression is mediated by T-cell death. Thereafter, the action of metabolites was analyzed in a skin allograft model (BN --> LEW). Lewis recipients received daily s.c. injections of tryptophan metabolite mixture (kynurenine + 3-hydroxyanthranilic acid), cyclosporin A (positive control), or no treatment (negative control). The metabolites induced a significant prolongation (P = 0.0018) of graft survival. We conclude that IDO-induced tryptophan metabolites suppress the T-cell response and prolong allograft survival in rats.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据