4.5 Article

Plant generalization on pollinators: Species property or local phenomenon?

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 13-20

出版社

BOTANICAL SOC AMER INC
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.1.13

关键词

annual variation; geographical variation; individual variation; Lavandula larifolia; pollinator diversity; pollinator eneralization; rarefaction curves; species richness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite recent increased interest in the frequency and evolutionary consequences of generalization in plant-pollinalor systems, little is known on whether plant generalization oil pollinators actually is a species-level trait. This paper address, the following questions. for the insect-pollinated shrub Lavandula latifolia: (1) Are different populations of this pollinatolr-generalist plant similarly generalized? (2) Within a highly generalized population, are all plants similarly pollinator-generalists? Comparable values for richness in pollinator species were obtained from individual- or population-specific rarefaction curves as the projected number of distinct pollinator species implicated in 100 flower visits (S-RAR100). Simple counts of pollinator species recorded per individual or population (S-OBS) were weakly or nonsignificantly correlated with corresponding S-RAR100 figures and closely correlated with flower visitation frequency. The pollination system of L. latifolia was highly generalized at the regional level, but populations differed greatly in pollinator species richness (S-RAR100). Within the population intensively studied, individual plants had quite variable degrees of generalization, comparable in magnitude to variation among populations. It is concluded that generalization was not an invariant, species-level property in L. latifolia. Furthermore, pollinator diversity estimates based on S-OBS data may be heavily contingent on aspects related to both research design (sampling effort) and biological phenomena (variation in pollinator abundance or visitation rates), which may either mask or distort underlying ecological patterns of interest.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据