3.9 Article

Broad sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking ribosome-associated chaperone Ssb or Zuo1 to cations, including aminoglycosides

期刊

EUKARYOTIC CELL
卷 4, 期 1, 页码 82-89

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/EC.4.1.82-89.2005

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R37GM31107, R37 GM031107] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [R37GM031107] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Hsp70 Ssb and J protein Zuol of Saccharomyces cerevisiae are ribosome-associated molecular chaperones, proposed to be involved in the folding of newly synthesized polypeptide chains. Cells lacking Ssb and/or Zuol have been reported to be hypersensitive to cationic aminoglycoside protein synthesis inhibitors that affect translational fidelity and to NaCl. Since we found that Deltassb1 Deltassb2 (Deltassb1,2), Deltazuo1, and wild-type cells have very similar levels of translational misreading in the absence of aminoglycosides, we asked whether the sensitivities to aminoglycosides and NaCl represent a general increase in sensitivity to cations. We found that Deltassb1,2 and Deltazuo1 cells are hypersensitive to a wide range of cations. This broad sensitivity is similar to that of cells having lowered activity of major plasma membrane transporters, such as the major K+ transporters Trk1 and Trk2 or their regulators Hal4 and Hal5. Like Deltahal4,5 cells, Deltassb1,2 and Deltazuo1 cells have increased intracellular levels of Na+ and Li+ upon challenge with higher-than-normal levels of these cations, due to an increased rate of influx. In the presence of aminoglycosides, Deltassb1,2, Deltazuo1, and Deltahal 4,5 cells have similarly increased levels of translational misreading. We conclude that, in vivo, the major cause of the aminoglycoside sensitivity of cells lacking ribosome-associated molecular chaperones is a general increase in cation influx, perhaps due to altered maturation of membrane proteins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据