4.3 Article

Percutaneous renal artery denervation in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial

期刊

CARDIOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 26, 期 5, 页码 503-510

出版社

VIA MEDICA
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0028

关键词

renal denervation; sympathetic nervous system; heart failure; blood pressure; cardiology

资金

  1. National Natural Science of China [81303145]
  2. Key Projects of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [20134003]
  3. Key Medical Discipline Construction Projects of Shanghai Municipal Health Bureau [ZK2015A147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Renal denervation (RDN) is as an effective treatment for heart failure (HF), but its effects on cardiac function of patients with HF are not well documented. Here, the aim was to investigate RDN's effect on patients with chronic systolic HF, by conducting a single-center, prospective, randomized, and controlled study. Methods: Sixty patients with chronic systolic HF were randomly assigned to the RDN or control groups, receiving percutaneous catheter-based RDN with radiofrequency ablation and drug treatment, respectively. All patients performed a 6-minute walk test, echocardiography, blood pressure measurement, and biochemical test, at both baseline and in a 6-month follow up. Results: Over 6-month follow up, patients in RDN group showed a decrease in N-terminal pr B-type natriuretic peptide (440.1 +/- 226.5 pg/mL vs. 790.8 +/- 287.0 pg/mL, p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 1.14), an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (39.1 +/- 7.3% vs. 35.6 +/- 3.3%, p = 0.017, Cohen's d = 0.61), improved New York Heart Association class assessment (p = 0.01, Cohen's d = 0.66), and decreased blood pressures (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 0.91), without reporting hypotension and syncope amaurosis. No significant between-group difference was observed for glomerular filtration rate and heart rate. Conclusions: Renal denervation which effectively and safely improves patient's cardiac function as well as exercise tolerance, could be considered as an effective treatment for chronic systolic HF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据