4.7 Article

Perfusion and chemical monitoring of living cells on a microfluidic chip

期刊

LAB ON A CHIP
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 56-63

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b404974h

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R37DK046960, R01DK046960] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK46960] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A microfluidic device that incorporates continuous perfusion and an on-line electrophoresis immunoassay was developed, characterized, and applied to monitoring insulin secretion from single islets of Langerhans. In the device, a cell chamber was perfused with cell culture media or a balanced salt solution at 0.6 to 1.5 muL min(-1). The flow was driven by gas pressure applied off-chip. Perfusate was continuously sampled at 2 nL min(-1) by electroosmosis through a separate channel on the chip. The perfusate was mixed on-line with fluorescein isothiocyanate-labeled insulin (FITC-insulin) and monoclonal anti-insulin antibody and allowed to react for 60 s as the mixture traveled down a 4 cm long reaction channel. The cell chamber and reaction channel were maintained at 37 degreesC. The reaction mixture was injected onto a 1.5 cm separation channel as rapidly as every 6 s, and the free FITC-insulin and the FITC-insulin-antibody complex were separated under an electric field of 500 to 600 V cm(-1). The immunoassay had a detection limit of 0.8 nM and a relative standard deviation of 6% during 2 h of continuous operation with standard solutions. Individual islets were monitored for up to 1 h while perfusing with different concentrations of glucose. The immunoassay allowed quantitative monitoring of classical biphasic and oscillatory insulin secretion with 6 s sampling frequency following step changes in glucose from 3 to 11 mM. The 2.5 cm x 7.6 cm microfluidic system allowed for monitoring islets in a highly automated fashion. The technique should be amenable to studies involving other tissues or cells that release chemicals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据