4.4 Article

Periosteum stimulates subchondral bone densification in autologous chondrocyte transplantation in a sheep model

期刊

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
卷 319, 期 1, 页码 133-142

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-004-1001-8

关键词

subchondral bone density; periosteum; collagen membrane; autologous chondrocyte transplantation; sheep (female common German)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this sheep study, we have tested the hypothesis that an osteogenic response is triggered in the subchondral bone by periosteum implanted in full thickness cartilage defects and can be prevented by replacing the periosteum by a cell-free collagen type I/III membrane. Two 7-mm diameter osteochondral defects were made in the trochlea groove and in the medial femoral condyle of one of the knees in each of 15 adult sheep. The animals were divided into three groups (n=5): a control group with untreated cartilage defects, a group treated with autologous chondrocyte transplantation (ACT) and periosteum, and a group treated with ACT in combination with a collagen I/III membrane cover. Histological examination was performed 1 year later. The optical density of the subchondral bone in the histological sections was measured with digital imaging software. There was a dramatic, statistically significant (P<0.0001; power=1) increase in bone density of 45%-70% under defects that were treated with the periosteal cover, compared with the collagen membrane and control groups, which displayed the same bone density. There was no difference in the cartilaginous reparative tissue in the defects in the three groups. Periosteum thus stimulates the remodelling process in subchondral bone. Stiffening of the subchondral bone can lead to degeneration of the overlying reparative cartilaginous tissue because of an increase in the mechanical stress in the tissue. These findings warrant evaluation of subchondral bone changes in patients treated by ACT and the correlation of these changes with clinical outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据