4.6 Article

Physicians' attitudes to the pharmacological treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris

期刊

QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 41-51

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hci006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Little is known about how physicians' knowledge of and attitudes to practice guidelines for stable angina may influence their implementation. Aim: To explore the association between physicians' demographics, their knowledge, and opinions about stable angina and their self-reported adherence to guideline recommendations. Design: Questionnaire-based survey. Methods: We surveyed 1228 Quebec physicians using a questionnaire based on the 'awareness-to-adherence' conceptual framework to measure their adherence with recommendations for the pharmacological treatment of stable angina. Independent predictors of adherence with the targeted recommendations were determined by stepwise linear regression analysis. Results: We received 877 (71.4%) responses from the 1228 eligible physicians. More than 90% of respondents were aware of and agreed with the targeted recommendations. However, the adoption rate varied, even among physicians who generally agreed with the guidelines. Factor analysis indicated that most physicians agreed with recommendations concerning ASA. More negative attitudes were expressed toward beta-blockers and hypolipaemic drugs. Respondents trusted the recommendations of a variety of scientific and professional organizations. Awareness, agreement, and adoption were the strongest predictors of adherence for the three recommendations. Physician demographics and practice characteristics did not predict adherence. Discussion: Physicians were aware of and agreed with the recommendations, so additional large-scale dissemination of the guidelines would be unlikely to improve prescription patterns. However, negative attitudes about beta-blockers and hypolipaemic therapy affected adherence to recommendations for these drugs. Continuing medical education interventions involving local opinion leaders might address some of the obstacles identified.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据