4.4 Article

Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist inhibits the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in colorectal carcinoma

期刊

ONCOLOGY
卷 68, 期 2-3, 页码 138-145

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000086768

关键词

colorectal carcinoma; interleukin-1 beta; interleukin-1 receptor antagonist; vascular endothelial growth factor

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Interleukin (IL)-1 is known to act as a tumor growth factor by inducing angiogenic factors. We examined the significance of IL-1 beta and IL-1 receptor antagonist (RA) for inducing the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in colorectal cancers. Methods: We investigated the expression of VEGF induced by IL-1 beta in five colon cancer cell lines and the possible involvement of IL-1 RA. We also measured the tissue concentrations of IL-1 beta, IL-1 RA and VEGF by ELISA in 65 colorectal cancer patients. Results: IL-1 beta induced VEGF secretion with a 19-fold increase in Caco-2 cells. A significant increase in VEGF secretion was also observed in SW480 and WiDr cells. IL-1 RA inhibited IL-1 beta-induced VEGF secretion by 87%. Our data from the clinically obtained specimens showed that the IL-1 RA/IL-1 beta ratio is significantly lower in cancer tissue. Regarding the clinicopathological parameters, the IL-1 RA/IL-1 beta ratio was significantly lower in patients with vessel involvement than in those without involvement, and IL-1 RA/IL-1 beta ratio was negatively correlated with the VEGF protein level in colorectal tumors. Conclusions: Our data suggest that IL-1 beta induces VEGF expression and IL-1RA acts as the competitive inhibitor, and that the IL-1RA/IL-1 beta ratio is significant for VEGF expression in the microenvironment of colorectal cancer tissue. We conclude that IL-1 beta induces VEGF secretion in a certain population of colorectal cancer patients, and that IL-1 RA is the potential therapeutic agent for antiangiogenic therapy in colorectal cancer patients. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据