4.7 Article

A robust hybrid between genetic algorithm and support vector machine for extracting an optimal feature gene subset

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 16-23

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.09.007

关键词

feature gene selection; genetic algorithm; support vector machine; microarray

资金

  1. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL066251] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL066251-03, R01 HL066251-01A2, R01 HL066251-02, R01 HL066251-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Development of a robust and efficient approach for extracting useful information from microarray data continues to be a significant and challenging task. Microarray data are characterized by a high dimension, high signal-to-noise ratio, and high correlations between genes, but with a relatively small sample size. Current methods for dimensional reduction can further be improved for the scenario of the presence of a single (or a few) high influential gene(s) in which its effect in the feature subset would prohibit inclusion of other important genes. We have formalized a robust gene selection approach based on a hybrid between genetic algorithm and support vector machine. The major goal of this hybridization was to exploit fully their respective merits (e.g., robustness to the size of solution space and capability of handling a very large dimension of feature genes) for identification of key feature genes (or molecular signatures) for a complex biological phenotype. We have applied the approach to the microarray data of diffuse large B cell lymphoma to demonstrate its behaviors and properties for mining the high-dimension data of genome-wide gene expression profiles. The resulting classifier(s) (the optimal gene subset(s)) has achieved the highest accuracy (99%) for prediction of independent microarray samples in comparisons with marginal filters and a hybrid between genetic algorithm and K nearest neighbors. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据