4.5 Article

Operational sex ratio in newts: field responses and characterization of a constituent chemical cue

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY
卷 16, 期 1, 页码 286-293

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arh164

关键词

chemical cues; mating competition; mating system; Notophtalmus viridescens; olfaction; operational sex ratio; pheromone; salamander; sexual selection; spatiotemporal variation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Operational sex ratio (OSR) has been traditionally thought of as a force imposing competition for mates rather than also a cue used to regulate the intrasexual competition individuals encounter. To assess whether eastern red-spotted newts, Notophthalmus viridescens, could appropriately compare OSRs, we quantified field responses to traps containing four males, a sexually receptive female, four males plus a female, or nothing as a control. Early in the breeding season, males from two populations chose competitive mating opportunities over no mating opportunity at all, but generally preferred less competitive mating prospects. Later in the breeding season, as the OSR of newt populations becomes more male biased, males accordingly increased their acceptance of intrasexual competition. Females avoided groups of four males, and for both sexes, avoidance of male-biased courting groups increased their probability of amplexus courtship. We then isolated an approximately 33-kD protein from male cloacal glands that was used by males to compare OSRs. To our knowledge, this protein represents the first isolated and characterized component of an olfactory cue used to evaluate OSR. These results support two important principles regarding mating systems: (1) OSR can somewhat paradoxically be both the source imposing competition for mates and the source used to reduce it, and (2) analogous to the sex in short supply often being choosy selecting mates, the sex in excess (here, males) appears to be choosy about its acceptance of intrasexual competition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据