4.3 Article

A Low-Dose β1-Blocker Effectively and Safely Slows the Heart Rate in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure and Rapid Atrial Fibrillation

期刊

CARDIOLOGY
卷 127, 期 2, 页码 105-113

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000355312

关键词

Acute decompensated heart failure; beta-Blocker; Atrial fibrillation; Tachycardia

资金

  1. Ministry of Education of Japan [20591805]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation of Japan
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20591805, 23592256, 23390215] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Recently, we reported that low-dose landiolol (1.5 mu g.kg(-1).min(-1)), an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, safely decreased the heart rate (HR) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) and sinus tachycardia, thereby improving cardiac function. We investigated whether low-dose landiolol effectively decreased the HR in ADHF patients with rapid atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: We enrolled 23 ADHF patients with rapid AF (HR >= 120 beats.min(-1) and New York Heart Association class III-IV) and systolic heart failure (SHF: n = 12) or diastolic heart failure (DHF: n = 11) who received conventional therapy with diuretics, vasodilators, and/or low-dose inotropes. They were administered continuous intravenous infusion of low-dose landiolol (1.0-2.0 mu g.kg(-1.)min(-1)), and their electrocardiograms and blood pressures were monitored for 24 h thereafter. Results: Two hours after starting landiolol, the HR was reduced significantly (22%), without a reduction in blood pressure, and remained constant thereafter. The HR reduction 2 h after landiolol administration was significantly greater in the DHF group than in the SHE group. No incidence of hypotension was recorded. Conclusions: Digitalis or amiodarone is currently recommended for HR control in ADHF patients with rapid AF. Our results showed that continuous infusion of low-dose landiolol may also be useful as first-line therapy in these patients. (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据