4.3 Article

Overexpression of MicroRNA-1 Improves the Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation after Myocardial Infarction

期刊

CARDIOLOGY
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 18-30

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000347081

关键词

Mesenchymal stem cells; Myocardial infarction; Transplantation; MicroRNA-1; Cardiomyogenic differentiation; Heart function

资金

  1. National Nature Scientific Funding of China [30871053]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this research was to study whether transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) overexpressing microRNA-1 into mouse infarcted myocardium can enhance cardiac myocyte differentiation and improve cardiac function efficiently. Methods: Eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice underwent ligation of the left coronary artery to produce models of myocardial infarction. The ligated animals were randomly divided into 4 groups (20 in each). One week later, they were intramyocardially injected at the heart infarcted zone with microRNA-1-transduced MSCs (MSCmiR-1 group), mock-vector-transduced MSCs (MSCnull group), MSCs (MSC group) or medium (PBS group). At 4 weeks post-transplantation, transthoracic echocardiographic assessment, histological evaluation and Western blot were performed. Results: The transplanted MSCs were able to differentiate into cardiomyocytes in the infarcted zone. Cardiac function in the MSC, MSCnull and MSCmiR-1 groups was significantly improved compared to the PBS group (p < 0.01 or p < 0.001). However, treatment of MSCs expressing microRNA-1 was more effective for cardiac repair and improved cardiac function more efficiently by enhancing cell survival and cardiac myocyte differentiation compared to the MSC group or the MSC null groups (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Transplantation of microRNA-1-transfected MSCs was more conducive to repair of infarct injury and improved heart function by enhancing transplanted cells survival and cardiomyogenic differentiation. Copyright (C) 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据