4.5 Article

The Keller-Segel model with logistic sensitivity function and small diffusivity

期刊

SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS
卷 66, 期 1, 页码 286-308

出版社

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/040612841

关键词

chemotaxis; hyperbolic limit; entropy solution; exponential asymptotics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Keller-Segel model is the classical model for chemotaxis of cell populations. It consists of a drift-diffusion equation for the cell density coupled to an equation for the chemoattractant. Here a variant of this model is studied in one-dimensional position space, where the chemotactic drift is turned off for a limiting cell density by a logistic term and where the chemoattractant density solves an elliptic equation modeling a quasi-stationary balance of reaction and diffusion with production of the chemoattractant by the cells. The case of small cell diffusivity is studied by asymptotic and numerical methods. On a time scale characteristic for the convective effects, convergence of solutions to weak entropy solutions of the limiting nonlinear hyperbolic conservation law is proven. Numerical and analytic evidence indicates that solutions of this problem converge to irregular patterns of cell aggregates separated by entropic shocks from vacuum regions as time tends to infinity. Close to each of these patterns an almost stationary solution of the full parabolic problem can be constructed up to an exponentially small ( in terms of the cell diffusivity) residual. Based on a metastability hypothesis, the methods of exponential asymptotics are used to derive systems of ordinary differential equations approximating the long-time behavior of the parabolic problem on exponentially large time scales. The observed behavior is a coarsening process reminiscent of phase change models. A hybrid asymptotic-numerical approach for the simulation of the system is introduced, and the accuracy of this new approach is shown by comparison to numerical simulations of the full problem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据