4.6 Article

Polymorphisms in microRNA genes as predictors of clinical outcomes in colorectal cancer patients

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 82-86

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgu224

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (GACR) [CZ GACR GAP304/12/1585]
  2. Internal Grant Agency (IGA) of the Czech Ministry of Health [IGA NT14329-3]
  3. Compagnia di San Paolo Torino, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates whether variants in miRNA genes, previously associated with prognosis, can predict CRC clinical outcome in CRC patients from the Czech Republic. Two polymorphisms in miRNAs resulted significantly associated with survival/recurrence in patients undergoing 5-FU-based chemotherapy.Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies worldwide. It is routinely cured by a 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy which improves outcomes in patients. We investigated the effect of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in two microRNA (miRNA)-encoding genes that have been previously reported as important in prognosis in patients with stage III CRC and treated with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Two SNPs (rs4919510 in miR-608 and rs213210 in miR-219-1) were genotyped in 1083 CRC patients recruited in the Czech Republic to evaluate their effect on clinical outcomes. Carriers of the variant T allele in rs213210 and receiving 5-FU chemotherapy were associated with a significantly worse survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20-3.98; adjusted P = 0.01] and an increased risk of relapse (HR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.16-3.25; adjusted P = 0.01). After further stratification for tumor grading, stage III patients carrying the G allele of rs4919510 and undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy were at decreased risk of relapse (HR = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.20-0.94; adjusted P = 0.03). The present study confirms that variations in miRNA-encoding genes may be an important factor for modulating CRC prognosis and predicting therapy response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据