4.6 Review

Agricultural management impacts on soil organic carbon storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions

期刊

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
卷 72, 期 1, 页码 87-121

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-004-0360-2

关键词

agroecosystems; carbon sequestration; greenhouse gas mitigation; IPCC; land use and management; soil organic carbon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We conducted a meta-analysis to quantify the impact of changing agricultural land use and management on soil organic carbon (SOC) storage under moist and dry climatic conditions of temperate and tropical regions. We derived estimates of management impacts for a carbon accounting approach developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, addressing the impact of long-term cultivation, setting-aside land from crop production, changing tillage management, and modifying C input to the soil by varying cropping practices. We found 126 articles that met our criteria and analyzed the data in linear mixed-effect models. In general, management impacts were sensitive to climate in the following order from largest to smallest changes in SOC: tropical moist> tropical dry> temperate moist> temperate dry. For example, long-term cultivation caused the greatest loss of SOC in tropical moist climates, with cultivated soils having 0.58 +/- 0.12, or 58% of the amount found under native vegetation, followed by tropical dry climates with 0.69 +/- 0.13, temperate moist with 0.71 +/- 0.04, and temperate dry with 0.82 +/- 0.04. Similarly, converting from conventional tillage to no-till increased SOC storage over 20 years by a factor of 1.23 +/- 0.05 in tropical moist climates, which is a 23% increase in SOC, while the corresponding change in tropical dry climates was 1.17 +/- 0.05, temperate moist was 1.16 +/- 0.02, and temperate dry was 1.10 +/- 0.03. These results demonstrate that agricultural management impacts on SOC storage will vary depending on climatic conditions that influence the plant and soil processes driving soil organic matter dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据