4.3 Review

Prognosticating the humic complexation for redox sensitive actinides through analogy, using the charge neutralisation model

期刊

RADIOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 93, 期 1, 页码 43-55

出版社

R OLDENBOURG VERLAG
DOI: 10.1524/ract.93.1.43.58296

关键词

actinides; humic substances; complexation; thorium; plutonium; neptunium; uranium; analogy; redox

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complexation of redox sensitive elements by humic acid (HA), described through the charge neutralisation model (CNM), has been reviewed in order to have a comprehensive scope. The data acquired in HUMICS program on thorium(IV), and data available in the literature, were reinterpreted according to the CNM, and adapted to uranium(IV), neptunium(IV) and plutonium(IV) through analogy in order to draw a boundary prediction. Otherwise, available data obtained in the framework of the CNM were used, or adapted if necessary, for other redox states when the analogy is justified, i.e. Am3+-Cm3+ for Pu3+, NPO2+ for PuO2+ and UO22+ for PuO2(2+). The obtained speciation diagrams indicate that, when (HA) = 100 mg/L, redox sensitive actinides should be reduced to their +IV state when E-h less than or equal to 650 mV/SHE for plutonium, E-h less than or equal to 100 mV/SHE for neptunium and E-h less than or equal to -20 mV/SHE for U. Plutonium could be present as mixtures of plutonium(III) and (IV) depending on the pH value in reducing ground waters -150 less than or equal to E-h (mV/SHE) less than or equal to 150. The known reduction of neptunium(V) to neptunium(IV) in Gorleben ground waters seems also well represented, so is the stability of uranium(VI) in humic solution when E-h greater than or equal to 100 mV/SHE. Conversely, the known association of plutonium(VI) in marine systems is not satisfactorily represented, so does is the uranium behaviour under reducing conditions. Experiments under well-controlled conditions are still needed to ascertain the plutonium and uranium comportment in the presence of humic acid.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据