4.6 Article

Deficiency of the Kruppel-like factor KLF4 correlates with increased cell proliferation and enhanced skin tumorigenesis

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 33, 期 6, 页码 1239-1246

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgs143

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1K01DK069489, 1R03AR060987]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is a transcription factor that is highly expressed in differentiated epithelial cells including that of the skin. It is critical for specification or function of differentiated epithelial cells. Moreover, KLF4 functions either as a tumor suppressor or an oncogene depending on different cellular contexts. However, the role of KLF4 in skin tumorigenesis remains controversial To address this issue, we first examined KLF4 expression using a cohort of samples from patients with skin squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma and found that in 21 or 24 tumor tissues (87.5%), KLF4 expression as assayed by immunohistochemistry was absent when compared with that in normal tissues. In addition, knockdown of KLF4 in human epidermal squamous cell carcinoma SCC13 cells was accompanied by increased cell growth. Further analysis revealed that KLF4 deficiency promoted cell migration and adhesion, which are the important properties of tumor cells. These observations were supported by the effect upon overexpression of KLF4 in SCC13 cells. Furthermore, we generated a novel tamoxifen-inducible KLF4/CreER and KLF4(flox) double transgenic mouse model to examine the role of KLF4 in skin cancer development. Consistent with in vitro studies, KLF4 deficiency increased the ability of migration and adhesion of mouse primary skin keratinocytes. Moreover, KLF4 knockout led to increased cell proliferation and skin carcinogenesis in a classical DMBA/TPA mouse skin cancer model. Taken together, our data suggest that KLF4 inhibits cell proliferation, migration and adhesion and that loss of KLF4 promotes skin tumorigenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据