4.0 Article

Sorption of acetochlor herbicide by soil samples, humic acids and humin from an argisol under no-till and conventional tillage systems

期刊

REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 705-714

出版社

SOC BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIA DO SOLO
DOI: 10.1590/S0100-06832005000500006

关键词

humic substances; soil management; liquid chromatography; organic matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SORPTION OF ACETOCHLOR HERBICIDE BY SOIL SAMPLES, HUMIC ACIDS AND HUMIN FROM AN ARGISOL UNDER NO-TILL AND CONVENTIONAL TILLAGE SYSTEMS The sorption of herbicides to soil is a process determinant of its dynamics in the environment. For weakly polar compounds such as acetochlor, organic matter represents the main sorbent in soil. The goal of this study was to evaluate the sorption of acetochlor on soil samples, humic acids and humin from an Argissolo Vermelho distrofico (PVd-Paleudult) under no-till and conventional tillage systems. Sorption isotherms were carried out at room temperature and the herbicide concentration was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. The samples were characterized by their contents of organic carbon and of humic substances, the humic acids and humin were characterized by elemental analyses. The sorption capacity of acetochlor was higher in the no-till soil (K-d = 1.22 +/- 0.11 L kg(-1), K-OC = 116 +/- 10 L kg(-1) C) in comparison to that under conventional tillage (Kd 0.76 +/- 0.08 L kg(-1), Koc = 86 +/- 8 L kg(-1) C). This behavior was partially related to the higher organic carbon content of the no-till sample. Sorption by humic acids from conventional tillage soil (K-d = 178 +/- 18.9 L kg(-1), K-OC = 352 L kg(-1) C) was similar to that from the no-till soil (K-d = 158 +/- 14.6 L kg(-1), K-OC = 321 +/- 30 L kg(-1) C); a similar situation was verified with humin. Among the analyzed humic fractions, humin presented the highest sorption capacity (K-d = 1.028 and 1.183 L kg(-1), K-OC = 2.691 and 2.892 L kg(-1) C).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据