4.7 Article

Fluvial origin of the valley system in northern Victoria Land (Antarctica) from quantitative geomorphic analysis

期刊

GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN
卷 117, 期 1-2, 页码 212-228

出版社

ASSOC ENGINEERING GEOLOGISTS GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY AMER
DOI: 10.1130/B25529.1

关键词

quantitative analysis; landscape evolution; Transantarctic Mountains; east Antarctica; Cenozoic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A network of sinuous valleys with typical dendritic pattern characterizes northern Victoria Land (NVL) in Antarctica. Subparallel to parallel and angular to rectangular patterns are also present. Quantitative geomorphic analysis of the valley network has been carried out utilizing GIS spatial analysis. While drainage densities and drainage frequencies show low values, segments of the NVL valley network are substantially well organized, as indicated by bifurcation ratio (R.) and direct bifurcation ratio (R-bd) parameters. All basins faithfully adhere to Horton's laws of drainage network composition. Quantitative geomorphic analysis suggests that the valley system can be ascribed to fluvial origin and that consequently, a morphoclimatic system completely different from that of present day must have driven its carving. The resulting data provide indications about the origin of the valley network and this invaluable information can be used for the reconstruction of earlier phases of glacial history and climatic and tectonic evolution of this significant Antarctic region. Fluvial erosion enhanced the denudation of the Trans-antarctic Mountains from at least 55 Ma to at least the Eocene-Oligocene boundary (ca 34 Ma). Fluvial basins adapted to the tectonic structure, following the main regional fault systems. A well-developed alpine topography postdates the fluvial morphology. Temperate glaciers were responsible for denudation until the Late Miocene. Parasitic glaciers presently mantle the previously sculpted topography. Present-day glacial erosion is negligible and denudation has been exceedingly slow since 7.5 Ma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据