4.6 Article

Decreased risk of colorectal cancer with the high natural killer cell activity NKG2D genotype in Japanese

期刊

CARCINOGENESIS
卷 29, 期 2, 页码 316-320

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgm260

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: NKG2D is an immune receptor on natural killer (NK) and other cells active in the immune system. It recognizes ligands expressed on mainly transformed cells and plays a role in their elimination through the so-called 'cancer immune surveillance'. It was reported that there are two haplotypes of NKG2D, HNK1 (high NK activity) and LNK1 (low NK activity). Harboring the HNK1 is reported to reduce the overall cancer risk. To elucidate its impact on colorectal cancer (CRC), we conducted the present case-control study. Method: The subjects were 379 CRC patients and 1137 sex-age-matched non-cancer controls. Data on lifestyle factors including diet were obtained by self-administered questionnaire. The NKG2D genotypes (rs1049174: G-C, LNK1/LNK1:CC; LNK1/HNK1:CG and HNK1/HNK1:GG) were assessed by the TaqMan method. Associations were then assessed by multivariate logistic regression models, considering potential confounders. The measure of association was the odds ratio (OR) and its confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We found a reduced risk of CRC with the NKG2D HNK1. Adjusted ORs were 0.77 for LNK1/HNK1 (95% CI: 0.60-0.99) and 0.48 for HNK1/HNK1 (0.32-0.72) relative to LNK1/LNK1. The same association was consistently observed with stratified analyses across all confounders except regular exercise and body mass index (BMI). Thus, the impact of harboring HNK1 was more evident among those with BMI >= 25 and those exercising regularly, suggesting possible interactions between NKG2D genotype and these factors. Conclusion: We found that the HNK1 genotype, associated with high NK cell activity, might be an independent protective factor for CRC among the Japanese population. This possibility warrants further analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据