4.4 Article

Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in intracerebral hemorrhage

期刊

NEUROCRITICAL CARE
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 260-270

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/NCC:3:3:260

关键词

intracerebral hemorrhage; brain tissue oxygen tension; translational research; swine model

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [K23NS41420] Funding Source: Medline
  2. ODCDC CDC HHS [R49CCR903697] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Brain tissue oxygen (PbrO2) monitoring is an emerging technique for detection of secondary brain injury in neurocritical care. Although it has been extensively reported in traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, its use in nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) has not been well described. We report complementary preliminary studies in a large animal model and in patients that demonstrate the feasibility of PbrO2 monitoring after ICH. Methods: To assess early events after ICH, Licox Clark-type oxygen probes were inserted in the bilateral frontal white matter of four anesthetized swine that subsequently underwent right parietal hematoma formation in an experimental model of ICH. Intracranial pressure (ICP) was monitored as well. Seven patients with acute ICH, who were undergoing ICP monitoring as part of standard neurocritical care, had placement of a frontal oxygen probe, with subsequent monitoring for up to 7 days. Results: In the swine ICH model, a rise in ICP early after hematoma formation was accompanied by a decrease in ipsilateral and contralateral PbrO2. Secondary increases in hematoma volume resulted in further decreases in PbrO2 over the first hour after ICH. In patients undergoing oxygen monitoring, low PbrO2 (<15 mmHg) was common. In these patients, changes in FiO2, mean arterial pressure, and cerebral perfusion pressure (but not ICP) predicted subsequent change in PbrO2. Conclusion: Brain tissue oxygen monitoring is feasible in ICH patients, as well as in a swine model of ICH. Translational research that emphasizes complementary information derived from human and animal studies may yield additional insights not available from either alone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据