4.1 Article

Airway remodeling in asthma

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 1-6

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000146779.26339.d8

关键词

extracellular matrix; smooth muscle; fibroblast; asthma; mitogenic stimuli

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review This overview summarizes some the more recent studies of remodeling in patients with asthma, studies using animal models to study the interaction of cell types and mediators, and studies using in vitro models to assess the effects of mitogenic stimuli, including mechanical strain, on mesenchymal cells and extracellular matrix proteins. The aim is to demonstrate how the term remodeling is becoming increasingly less specific as reductionism is applied to this field of study. Recent findings Specific areas of recent interest include plasticity of airway smooth muscle and fibroblast phenotype; the role of the extracellular matrix and its relation to the function of the airway smooth muscle and the mechanical properties of the airway wall; mitogenic stimuli arising from damaged epithelium, fibroblasts, smooth muscle cells, mast cells, eosinophils, and mechanical stress; extracellular and intracellular signaling in fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells; and therapeutic targets among the many pathways of remodeling-pathways that may be distinct from those involved in inflammation. The potential functional consequences of some of these findings call into question the role of remodeling. In some respects, it may represent a continuum from inflammation to scarring, but it may also be a protective response to altered airway mechanics caused by ongoing tissue damage or by abnormal airway structure present from early in life. Summary The diverse areas of research in this field are increasingly making the term remodeling as useful (or not) as the word asthma, because both can be used to describe simultaneously a large number of processes that may or may not be related to each other.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据