4.1 Article

The hygiene hypothesis and asthma

期刊

CURRENT OPINION IN PULMONARY MEDICINE
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 14-20

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.mcp.0000145791.13714.ae

关键词

asthma; hygiene hypothesis; allergen sensitization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review Reduced exposure to childhood infections may explain the, increased prevalence of allergic diseases in industrialized 1; countries (the hygiene hypothesis). This review will examine recent epidemiologic studies of the hygiene hypothesis and asthma. Recent findings Recent studies have confirmed previous findings of an inverse association between increased exposure to other children during childhood and either allergen sensitization or hay fever. However, there is conflicting evidence regarding the relation between exposure to other children and asthma. Although it has been hypothesized that vaccinations may influence the development of asthma, recent findings do not support this association. Serologic evidence of exposure to certain gastrointestinal pathogens (eg, hepatitis A virus) has been inversely associated with either allergen sensitization or asthma in some, but not all, recent studies. Although heavy infestation with certain parasites (eg, helminths) is protective against allergen sensitization, there is conflicting evidence regarding the relation between parasitic infection and asthma. The results of recent studies suggest that the relation between endotoxin exposure and asthma is complex and likely influenced by factors related to the exposure itself, the host, and other covariates. Although it has been postulated that antibiotic use in early life is a risk factor for asthma, this hypothesis is not supported by recent findings. Summary For every exposure studied with regard to the hygiene hypothesis, there are inconsistent findings in relation to asthma. The hygiene hypothesis is not likely to be the sole explanation for the ongoing asthma epidemic in industrialized nations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据