4.8 Article

Controlled synthesis, efficient purification, and electrochemical characterization of arc-discharge carbon nano-onions

期刊

CARBON
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 272-284

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.09.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (Center for Advanced Materials) [EPS-0814194]
  2. University of Kentucky

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arc-produced carbon nano-onions (A-CNOs), with a hollow core surrounded by multilayered sp(2) carbon shells, possess unique structural and electronic properties. While nanodiamond derived CNOs (5-7 nm) are attracting significant attentions, for A-CNOs (20-50 nm) controlling the growth and separating them from carbon impurities are the major challenges that impede further study and application of these materials. We have addressed these issues; first by designing an in-house automated underwater arc discharge apparatus to control the arc plasma that produces homogeneous A-CNOs (diameter 25-35 nm) with minimal carbon impurities. Secondly, for further purification we have developed a very efficient method by utilizing the strong preferential adsorption of polyoxometalates. A-CNO growth and purification were investigated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), Raman spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (XRD). Furthermore, the electrochemical properties and electrocatalytic activities of purified A-CNOs were investigated with various redox species including neurotransmitter molecules. Compared to glassy carbon (GC) electrode, A-CNO showed excellent electrochemical performances including larger faradaic currents and facilitated electron-transfer kinetics. Controlled synthesis, efficient purification and the excellent electrocatalytic activities of A-CNOs reported herein will enable the utilization of these materials for various applications including biosensing, fuel-cell catalysts and energy-storage devices. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据