4.1 Review

Dopaminergic contribution to the regulation of emotional perception

期刊

CLINICAL NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 228-237

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnf.0000185824.57690.f0

关键词

dopamine; emotional process; dopaminergic limbic system

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dopamine (DA) acts as a key neurotransmitter in the brain. Numerous studies have shown its regulatory role in motor and cognitive function. However, the impairment of emotional processes-in neurologic and psychiatric pathologies involving the dopaminergic system (Parkinson disease, schizophrenia, autism, Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder, Huntington disease, frontal lobe lesions), as well as the influence that administration of dopaminergic agonists/antagonists exert on the processing of emotion, Suggest a role for DA in emotional processes. Moreover, emotional processes are dependent upon a variety of structures, the majority of which form part of the limbic system and are subject to DA innervation. In reviewing the literature, the amygdala emerges as a brain structure critical for emotional processing. It may also be implicated in deficits in emotional recognition found in two major disorders where DA's implication is clear: Parkinson disease and schizophrenia. In addition, the amygdala's response to emotional tasks is likely to be altered by the administration of both agonist and antagonist dopaminergic drugs. Experimental studies reinforce the idea of a dopaminergic contribution to emotional response, as suggested by biochemical, pharmacologic, and lesion experiments. Although the implication of the dopaminergic system in emotional processing appears to be clearly documented. the contribution of specific DA receptor subtypes, or of the DA cotransmitters cholecystokinin and neurotensin, or even glutamate, is, however, still unclear. Altogether, these observations suggest that DA has, undoubtedly, a direct and/or indirect role in the full emotional process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据