4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Role of carnitine in modulating acute-phase protein synthesis in hemodialysis patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF RENAL NUTRITION
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 13-17

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.jrn.2004.09.008

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Increased serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) in uremic and dialysis patients are associated with low serum prealbumin and albumin concentrations and increased mortality and greater risk of cardiovascular disease. Proinflammatory cytokines may cause malnutrition by increasing protein catabolism. Many studies have shown that L-carnitine supplementation leads to improvements in several conditions seen in uremic patients, including cardiac complications, impaired exercise and functional capacities, muscle symptoms, increased symptomatic intradialytic hypotension, and erythropoietin-resistant anemia. L-carnitine therapy may either suppress the inflammatory response or act independently on both inflammation and appetite and/or anabolic processes. Moreover, L-carnitine may suppress proinflammatory cytokines in sick individuals without renal disease and may improve protein synthesis or nitrogen balance in patients without renal disease and in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients. In a pilot study, we provided preliminary evidence that treatment with L-carnitine, 20 mg/kg 3 times weekly at the end of each hemodialysis treatment, was associated with a reduction in serum CRP levels and improvement in anabolic status. The improvement or normalization of serum concentrations of serum CRP also was correlated with increased serum concentrations of albumin, transferrin, and blood hemoglobin. The possibility that some or all of these changes may have been caused by improved nutritional intake cannot be ruled out. Further randomized clinical trials will be necessary to confirm the role of L-carnitine as a modulator of inflammatory protein synthesis in hemodialysis patients. (C) 2005 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据