4.5 Article

Unsteady RANS modelling of wake-blade interaction: computational requirements and limitations

期刊

COMPUTERS & FLUIDS
卷 34, 期 1, 页码 3-21

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2004.04.001

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An investigation is presented of the ability of the unsteady RANS approach to represent, from a numerical point of view, the characteristics and evolution of moving wakes as they interact with the flow around a turbine blade and in a related variable-passage configuration. The context of the study is wake-induced transition in unsteady turbomachine flows. Its emphasis is on numerical and computational issues, with physical aspects of predicting unsteady transition in the boundary layer of a turbine blade being covered in a companion paper. Issues addressed include: resolution and time-step requirements-especially in relation to the convective transport of scalar-wake properties, the sensitivity of the solution to the numerical scheme, and the relative merits and limitations of either including the wake-generating moving devices-in the present case an array of circular bars-as part of the computational process, or of prescribing the moving wakes as part of the flow-inlet conditions upstream of the blade passage. In relation to the latter option, the viability of extracting the wake conditions from a precursor RANS computation for an isolated wake-generating body is examined. In total, results for 21 test conditions are reported in an effort to derive some general conclusions and recommendations. The investigation demonstrates that (i) extremely high resolution is needed to ensure that numerical issues do not obscure physical phenomena and turbulence-model capabilities; (ii) the inclusion of the wake-generating device in the computation poses serious problems associated with vortex shedding; and (iii) the results of precursor calculations for the wake can be seriously flawed because of inherent limitations in the RANS approach. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据