4.8 Article

Synthesis of high-quality monolayer and bilayer graphene on copper using chemical vapor deposition

期刊

CARBON
卷 49, 期 13, 页码 4122-4130

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.05.047

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CCF-0811880, MR05-20415]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr [0811880] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [0811880] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mechanisms determining the growth of high-quality monolayer and bilayer graphene on Cu using chemical vapor deposition (CVD) were investigated. It is shown that graphene growth on Cu is not only determined by the process parameters during growth, but also substantially influenced by the quality of Cu substrate and how the Cu substrate is pretreated. It is found that the micro-topography of the Cu surface strongly affects the uniformity of grown graphene while the purity of the Cu film determines the number of synthesized graphene layers at low pressure conditions. On the other hand, a minimum partial pressure of hydrocarbon is required for graphene to cover the Cu surface during graphene growth. The optimized bilayer graphene exhibits a maximum hole (electron) mobility of 5500 cm(2)V(-1)s(-1)(3900 cm(2)V(-1)s(-1)). A new growth mode resulting in tetragonal shaped graphene domain, which is different from the known lobe structure (for monolayer) or hexagonal (for few layer) mode, is also discovered under our experimental conditions. Furthermore, high resolution transmission electron microscopy has revealed the non-ideal nature of CVD graphene structure for the first time, indicating an important cause of electron/hole mobility degradation that is typically observed in CVD graphene. This observation could be crucial for optimization of the CVD process to further improve the quality of graphene. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据