4.2 Article

Smoking status and mammography among women aged 50-75 in the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

期刊

WOMEN & HEALTH
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 1-21

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1300/J013v41n04_01

关键词

women's health; smoking; mammography; preventive health services

资金

  1. AGENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY [T32HS000011] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [K07CA087070, K05CA090485] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. AHRQ HHS [T32-HS00011] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NCI NIH HHS [K07-CA87070, K05-CA90485] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Since the late 1980s, data show an association between smoking status and mammography. Women smokers reported 12-15% lower rates than non-smokers. This study investigated whether an association persists in a recent national- level database. Methods: The sample was women aged 50-75 years from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N = 52,300). Analyses used two definitions of recent mammography, one based on a one-year interval between exams, the other on a two-year interval. Smoking was classified as current, former, or never. Other covariates included socio-demographic variables, health practices, insurance status, and usual source of care. Results: The rate of mammography for current smokers was 16% lower than for never smokers for the past-year interval, and 14.0% lower for the two-year interval. Multiple logistic regression supported the smoking/mammography association. Other covariates associated with lower mammography on both dependent variables were recent Pap test, health insurance/usual source of care. recent dental visit, seat belt use, marital status, and age. Conclusions: Reasons for the persistent association between smoking and mammography must be determined. These variables will inform interventions with women who smoke. A key question is whether to intervene on smoking directly or whether mediating variables are sufficient targets of intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据