4.5 Article

The spectrum of substance use in mood and anxiety disorders

期刊

COMPREHENSIVE PSYCHIATRY
卷 46, 期 1, 页码 6-13

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2004.07.017

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the prevalence of threshold and subthreshold use of substances among patients with psychiatric disorders and 2 comparison groups. Participants were outpatients and inpatients with mood and anxiety disorders, subjects with opiate dependence, and a comparison group of individuals not undergoing treatment for psychiatric disorders. Assessments included the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Axis I Disorders, an interview exploring the spectrum of substance use (Structured Clinical Interview for the Spectrum of Substance Use), and a self-report instrument exploring the spectrum of 5 psychiatric disorders (General 5-Spectrum Measure). The overall frequency of substance use disorder (SUD) and that of subthreshold use were 46% and 8% in patients with bipolar disorder, 4% and 26% in those with panic disorder, 8% and 26% in those with obsessive-compulsive disorder, and 6% and 10% in the control group, respectively (x(2) = 51.6, P <.001). Inspection of standardized residuals indicated that alcohol use disorder and SUD were significantly (P <.05) more frequent in subjects with bipolar disorder than among those with obsessive-compulsive disorder or panic disorder. The latter showed a significantly higher subthreshold use of substances than control subjects. The pattern of motivations for use varied according to the psychiatric disorder. Our results suggest that the well-established relationship between SUDS and psychiatric disorders might be the end point of a process that starts from increased proneness to substance use, which first leads to self-medication and then may eventually develop into substance abuse or dependence, among subjects with psychiatric symptoms. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据