4.3 Article

Salamanders in forest-floor food webs: Environmental heterogeneity affects the strength of top-down effects

期刊

PEDOBIOLOGIA
卷 49, 期 5, 页码 381-393

出版社

URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.04.001

关键词

amphibians; bottom-up; detritus; field experiment; food webs; Plethodon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Terrestrial salamanders have been hypothesized to play an important role in the regulation of invertebrate communities on the forest floor. Previous studies testing this hypothesis have used field enclosure or laboratory microcosm methods that may bias outcomes, and no studies have addressed the extent to which environmental heterogeneity affects the strength of salamander effects. In the present study, the effects of the red-backed salamander, Plethodon cinereus, on forest-floor invertebrates were examined in open field plots in which neither the movements of salamanders nor invertebrates were impeded. This 2-year study assessed the influence of the bottom-up effect of leaf-litter mass by comparing salamander effects in the spring when litter was abundant to autumn, just prior to leaf fall, when litter thickness was low. Plethodon cinereus was found to exert top-down effects on several mesofaunal taxa, but no effects on macrofauna were detected. Salamander effects varied among sampling periods. Leaf-litter mass and, to a lesser extent, litter moisture were the determinants of invertebrate density in spring and fall 2003, whereas salamanders were the single significant factor influencing mesofaunal density in spring 2004, when both leaf-litter mass and litter moisture were especially high. Leaf-titter mass and salamanders in combination influenced mesofaunal densities in fall 2004. The results suggest that the top-down effects of salamanders are strongest in spring when hydric conditions and availability of moisture-retaining cover enhance salamander foraging success, and when salamanders affect initial, rapid stages of mesofaunal population growth. (c) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据