4.3 Article

Effects of inhaled ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on cortisol secretion and airway responsiveness to adenosine 5 ' monophosphate in asthmatic patients

期刊

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 328-336

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pupt.2005.01.004

关键词

drug aerosol therapy; asthma; anti-asthmatic agents; glucocorticosteroid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The efficacy and systemic effects of ciclesonide, a novel glucocorticosteroid, inhaled via pressurized metered-dose inhaler (pMDI) were compared with fluticasone propionate pMDI in 26 patients with asthma, using a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled, double dummy, 6-period crossover study design. Treatments were placebo, ciclesonide 320 mu g (ex-actuator dose) once daily (o.d.), ciclesonide 640 pg o.d., ciclesonide 640 mu g twice daily (b.i.d.), fluticasone propionate 440 mu g (ex-actuator dose) b.i.d., and fluticasone propionate 880 mu g b.i.d. The primary variable was area under the plasma cortisol concentration-time curve over 24 It (plasma cortisol AUC(0.24), relative to placebo) derived from samples taken every 2 h, on the 9th day of treatment. Secondary variables were 24-h urinary cortisol excretion and PC20 for adenosine 5'-monophosphate (AMP) (relative to placebo and expressed in doubling concentrations). Ciclesonide did not affect 24-h cortisol secretion. Fluticasone propionate suppressed cortisol secretion as demonstrated by a decrease in plasma cortisol AUCO-24, relative to placebo, by 29 % (95 % Cl 15-41) and 59 % (95 % CI 51-66) with 440 and 880 mu g b.i.d., respectively. PC20 more than doubled with each active treatment, but no statistically significant dose-response effect could be established. It was concluded that moderate to high doses of fluticasone propionate suppressed cortisol secretion, that ciclesonide did not suppress cortisol secretion, and that all active treatments decreased hyperresponsiveness to AMP. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据