4.7 Article

A novel discrete model for granular material incorporating rolling resistance

期刊

COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 340-357

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2005.05.001

关键词

kinematical models; contact laws; granulates; rolling resistance; discrete element methods

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [GR/R85785/01] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel two-dimensional (2D) discrete model for granular materials with rolling resistance. The salient features of our formulation are: it consists of a geometrically derived kinematical model, physically based mechanical contact models and locally equilibrated equations governing the motion of the rigid particles; only one additional parameter delta needs to be introduced in the model when compared with the standard discrete element method (DEM). In the study, precise definitions of pure sliding and pure rolling were proposed, and a decomposition of a general contact displacement was given in terms of these rolling and sliding components which are then linked to energy dissipation. The standard DEM assumption that grains are in contact at discrete points was here replaced by the assumption that grains are in contact over a width. By making the idealization that the grain contact width is continuously distributed with normal/tangential basic elements, we established a rolling contact model together with normal/tangential contact models, and also related the governing equations to local equilibrium. As an example of its application, the present model was incorporated into a DEM code to study the angle of internal friction phi of the material. Fifty-four DEM simulations showed that phi predicted by the novel model was increased in comparison to the standard DEM prediction, and may be closer to the values observed experimentally provided that the delta-phi relationship established in this paper was used. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据