4.5 Article

Glycans in immune recognition and response

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH
卷 389, 期 -, 页码 115-122

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2014.02.004

关键词

Sialic acid; Neu5Gc; Antibodies; Cancer; Immunotherapy; Biomarker

资金

  1. Israeli National Nanotechnology Initiative
  2. Helmsley Charitable Trust for a Focal Technology Area on Nanomedicines for Personalized Theranostics
  3. European Commission [PIIF-GA-2012327726, HEALTH-F4-2013-603049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glycans at the forefront of cells facilitate immune recognition processes. Cancer cells commonly present altered cell surface glycosylation, especially manifested in the expression of sialic acid at the termini of glycolipids and glycoproteins. Although tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (TACAs) result in expression of altered-self, most such carbohydrates do not elicit strong humoral responses. Various strategies had been devised to elicit increased immunogenicity of such TACA aiming for potent immunotherapeutic antibodies or cancer vaccines. However some carbohydrates are immunogenic in humans and hold potential for novel glycotherapies. N-Glycolylneuraminic acid (Neu5Gc) is a foreign immunogenic sugar in humans originating from the diet (e.g., red meat) and subsequently expressed on the cell surface, especially accumulating on carcinoma. Consequently, the human immune system detects this non-self carbohydrate generating a broad anti-Neu5Gc antibody response. The co-existence of Neu5Gc/anti-Neu5Gc within humans spurs chronic inflammation mediated disease, including cancer. Concurrently, anti-Neu5Gc antibodies hold potential for novel targeted therapy. alpha Gal is another foreign immunogenic carbohydrate antigen in humans and all humans have circulating anti-Gal antibodies. This review aims to describe the immunogenicity of Neu5Gc and its implications for human diseases, highlighting differences and similarities with aGal and its potential for novel targeted theranostics. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据