3.8 Article

Participation of autophagy in the degeneration process of rat hepatocytes after transplantation following prolonged cold preservation

期刊

ARCHIVES OF HISTOLOGY AND CYTOLOGY
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 71-80

出版社

INT SOC HISTOLOGY & CYTOLOGY
DOI: 10.1679/aohc.68.71

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cold ischemia-warm reperfusion injury of liver grafts has been investigated thoroughly, but its underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. Here we show that autophagy is involved not only during cold preservation but also during warm reperfusion following transplantation. Immunohistochemistry using an antibody against LC3, a microtubule associated protein I light chain 3 and a marker of autophagosomes, showed dot-like weak staining in hepatocytes of rat liver grafts during cold preservation. Since University of Wisconsin solution for graft preservation lacks amino acids, the induction of autophagy in hepatocytes was similar to that under starvation conditions. Intense immunopositive punctate structures were detected abundantly in the hepatocytes 30 min after the beginning of reperfusion. LC3-positive granules were often co-localized in ED2-positive Kupffer cells at 60 min of the reperfusion phase. The molecular form of LC3 was mainly LC3-II, a membrane-bound form, during reperfusion, especially at 30 min of the phase. Electron microscopic examination demonstrated numerous vacuolar structures in hepatocytes at 30 min of the reperfusion period, while some hepatocytes with such vacuolar structures were present in the sinusoidal lumen. At the late stage of the reperfusion period, Kupffer cells contained phagocytosed cells that possessed numerous autophagic vacuoles/autolysosomes and nuclei with condensed chromatin. Our results showing the presence of autophagic vacuoles/autolysosomes in hepatocytes of liver grafts after the start of reperfusion suggest that warm reperfusion acted as a stress stimulus to hepatocytes. Moreover, the stress response of hepatocytes may be involved in their degeneration process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据