4.1 Article

Establishment and characterization of 7 new monoclonal antibodies to tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1

期刊

TUMOR BIOLOGY
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 71-80

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1159/000085588

关键词

TIMP-1; monoclonal antibodies; epitope mapping; sandwich; affinity; TIMP-1 : MMP-9 complex; TIMP-1 : ProMMP-9 complex

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) plays a pivotal role in tissue remodeling processes, such as inflammation, wound healing and cancer invasion. Experimental results have pointed to a role in angiogenesis, cell proliferation, apoptosis and in malignant transformation. In clinical investigations high tumor tissue or plasma levels of TIMP-1 have been shown to have a strong and independent association with shorter survival time for breast and colorectal cancer patients, respectively. The purpose of this study has been to develop and characterize new anti-TIMP-1 monoclonal antibodies that may be useful in future development of TIMP-1 immunoassays. Peptide-based epitope mapping reveals linear epitopes. Surface plasmon resonance was used to determine antibody affinity and ability of antibodies to sandwich with each other. Antigen recognition was tested using ELISA and a chemiluminescence microtiter immunoassay format. Three antibodies recognized linear peptides. Estimated antibody affinities for TIMP-1 ranged from 6.6 x 10(8) to > 10(10) 1/M. Antibodies demonstrated different abilities in 'capture' and 'detection' positions in the sandwich experiment. All antibody pairs bound TIMP-1: ProMMP-9 complexes. TIMP-1: MMP- 9 complexes were marginally reactive with five antibody pairs. The results suggest that the antibodies are unique. They may be useful in designing assays that recognize various forms of TIMP-1. Future studies will clarify whether the use of different combinations of antibodies will increase the clinical value of TIMP-1 measurements in the treatment of cancer patients. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据