4.5 Article

The complete structure of the core of the LPS from Plesiomonas shigelloides 302-73 and the identification of its O-antigen biological repeating unit

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE RESEARCH
卷 345, 期 17, 页码 2523-2528

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2010.09.007

关键词

Outer-core Kdo; NMR spectroscopy; Plesiomonas; Reductive hydrolysis; Structure elucidation

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion, Ciencia y Deporte and Ministerio de Sanidad, Spain
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya (Centre de Referencia en Biotecnologia)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plesiomonas shigelloides is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen associated with gastrointestinal and extraintestinal infections, which especially invades immunocompromised patients and neonates. The lipopolysaccharides are one of the major virulence determinants in Gram-negative bacteria and are structurally composed of three different domains: the lipid A. the core oligosaccharide and the O-antigen polysaccharide. In the last few years we elucidated the structures of the O-chain and the core oligosaccharide from the P. shigelloides strain 302-73. In this paper we now report the characterization of the linkage between the core and the O-chain. The LPS obtained after PCP extraction contained a small number of O-chain repeating units. The product obtained by hydrazinolysis was analysed by FTICR-ESIMS and suggested the presence of an additional Kdo in the core oligosaccharide. Furthermore, the LPS was hydrolysed under mild acid conditions and a fraction that contained one O-chain repeating unit linked to a Kdo residue was isolated and characterized by FTICR-ESIMS and NMR spectroscopy. Moreover, after an alkaline reductive hydrolysis, a disaccharide alpha-Kdo-(2 -> 6)-GlcNol was isolated and characterized. The data obtained proved the presence of an alpha-Kdo in the outer core and allowed the identification of the O-antigen biological repeating unit as well as its linkage with the core oligosaccharide. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据