4.4 Article

Recent issues regarding r(WG), r*(WG), r(WG)(J), and r*(WG)(J)

期刊

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 128-138

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1094428104272181

关键词

interrater agreement; interrater disagreement; Spearman-Brown; r(WG)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A recent article by Lindell and Brandt raised two concerns regarding the use of James, Demaree, and Wolf's interrater agreement indices r(WG) and r(WG(J))(.) First, they noted that the multi-item r(WG(J)) equation is mathematically equivalent to inserting r(WG) into the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and questioned whether applying a formula developed for a reliability index was also appropriate for an agreement index. Second, they questioned the appropriateness of James et al.'s suggestion of replacing obtained negative values of r(WG) with zeros. This article addresses these concerns by demonstrating that r(WG(J)) can be derived independently from the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula and that negative values of rWG can be avoided by reparameterizing the structural equation underlying the data when there is systematic disagreement between subgroups of raters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据