4.7 Article

Polysaccharide from fermented Momordica charantia L. with Lactobacillus plantarum NCU116 ameliorates type 2 diabetes in rats

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 624-633

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.08.075

关键词

Colon microbiota; Fermentation; Momordica charantia; Polysaccharide; Type 2 diabetes

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFD0400705-2]
  2. Jiangxi Provincial Major Program of Research and Development Foundation [20165ABC28004]
  3. Outstanding Science and Technology Innovation Team Project in Jiangxi Province [20165BCB19001]
  4. Collaborative Project in Agriculture and Food Field [2017ZJGH0102001]
  5. Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology [SKLF-ZZA201611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of Lactobacillus plantarum-fermentation on the structure and anti-diabetic effects of Momordica charantia polysaccharides were evaluated. High-fat diet and streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats were administrated with polysaccharides from fermented and non-fermented Momordica charantia (FP and NFP) for 4 weeks. Fermentation affected the physicochemical characterization, monosaccharide composition, molecular weight, and viscosity of Momordica charantia polysaccharides. Treatment with FP significantly ameliorated hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, hyperlipidemia, and oxidative stress in diabetic rats compared with NFP. Moreover, the diversity and abundance of gut microbiota (Lactococcus laudensis and Prevotella loescheii) in diabetic rats were notably increased by treatment with FP in comparison to NFP. Meanwhile, FP-treated diabetic rats exhibited more colonic short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and lower pH values than that in NFP-treated rats. Overall, Lactobacillus plantarum-fermentation could enhance the anti-diabetes effects of Momordica charantia polysaccharides in rats by modifying the structure of polysaccharides to optimize gut microbiota and heighten the production of SCFAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据