4.7 Article

Characterization of an.antiproliferative exopolysaccharide (LHEPS-2) from Lactobacillus helveticus MB2-1

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 105, 期 -, 页码 334-340

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.093

关键词

Lactobacillus helyeticus MB2-1; Exopolysaccharides; Antiproliferative activity; Structural characterization; Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31201422, 31371807]
  2. High-Tech Research and Development Program of China [2011AA100903, 2013BAD18801-4]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK2011651]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110097120028, 20130097110022]
  5. Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we reported that three purified exopolysaccharides fractions (LHEPS-1, LHEPS-2 and LHEPS-3) and crude LHEPS from the Lactobacillus helveticus MB2-1 inhibited the proliferation potential of human gastric cancer BGC-823 cells. We found that all the LHEPS fractions and crude LHEPS exerted concentration and time dependent inhibitory activities in vitro on BGC-823 cells. LHEPS-2 exhibited higher antiproliferative activity against BGC-823 cells in vitro than LHEPS-1, LHEPS-3 and crude LHEPS. With the consideration of the outstanding antiproliferative effect of LHEPS-2 on BGC-823 cells, more fine structural characterization of LHEPS-2 was further identified. The structure of LHEPS-2 was elucidated by methylated analysis, GC MS, H-1 NMR and C-13 NMR spectroscopy, together with two-dimensional (2D) COSY, TOCSY, HSQC, HMBC and NOESY spectroscopy. Results showed that the LHEPS-2 was consisted of the following repeating units: alpha-D-Glc-(1 -> 4)-alpha-D-Man-(1 -> 6)-alpha-D-Glc 1 down arrow 6 (sic)4)-alpha-D-Man-(1 -> 6)-alpha-D-Man-alpha-(1 -> 4)-alpha-D-Gal-(1(sic)(n) (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据