4.3 Article

Cardiomyocyte dysfunction in models of type 1 and type 2 diabetes

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR TOXICOLOGY
卷 5, 期 3, 页码 285-292

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/CT:5:3:285

关键词

diabetes; cardiomyopathy; cardiomyocytes; db/db mice; SERCA2a; oxidative stress; calcium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cardiomyopathy is a major cause of mortality for both type I and 2 diabetic patients. However, experimental analysis of diabetic cardiomyopathy has focused on type 1 diabetes and there are few reports on cardiomyocyte dysfunction in the widely used type 2 diabetic model, db/db. In the current study, we assessed function in isolated ventricular myocytes from type I diabetic OVE26 mice and from type 2 diabetic db/db mice. When compared with their respective control strains, both diabetic models showed significant impairment in contractility, as assessed by percent peak shortening, maximal rate of contraction, and maximal rate of relaxation. The calcium decay rate was also significantly reduced in both types of diabetes, but the decrement was much greater in OVE26 myocytes, approx 50% vs only 20% in db/db myocytes. To understand the basis for slow calcium decay in diabetic myocytes and to understand the molecular basis for the quantitative difference between calcium decay in OVE26 and db/db myocytes, we measured cardiac content of the SERCA2a calcium pump. SERCA2a was significantly decreased in OVE26 diabetic myocytes but not reduced at all in db/db myocytes. The reduction of SERCA2a in OVE26 myocytes was completely prevented by overexpression of the antioxidant protein metallothionein, confirming that oxidative stress is an important component of diabetic cardiomyopathy. The current results demonstrate that though contractility is impaired in individual myocytes of db/db hearts and deficits are similar to what is seen in a severe model of type I diabetes, impairment in calcium reuptake is less severe, probably as a result of maintenance of normal levels of SERCA2a.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据