4.7 Article

Milling of rice grains: Effects of starch/flour structures on gelatinization and pasting properties

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 92, 期 1, 页码 682-690

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.09.023

关键词

Rice; Starch structure; Molecular size distribution; Granule damage; Gelatinization properties; Pasting properties

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0985694, LP0990769]
  2. Australian Research Council [LP0990769] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Starch gelatinization and flour pasting properties were determined and correlated with four different levels of starch structures in rice flour, i.e. flour particle size, degree of damaged starch granules, whole molecular size, and molecular branching structure. Onset starch-gelatinization temperatures were not significantly different among all flour samples, but peak and conclusion starch-gelatinization temperatures were significantly different and were strongly correlated with the flour particle size, indicating that rice flour with larger particle size has a greater barrier for heat transfer. There were slight differences in the enthalpy of starch gelatinization, which are likely associated with the disruption of crystalline structure in starch granules by the milling processes. Flours with volume-median diameter >= 56 mu m did not show a defined peak viscosity in the RVA viscogram, possibly due to the presence of native protein and/or cell-wall structure stabilizing the swollen starch granules against the rupture caused by shear during heating. Furthermore, RVA final viscosity of flour was strongly correlated with the degree of damage to starch granules, suggesting the contribution of granular structure, possibly in swollen form. The results from this study allow the improvement in the manufacture and the selection criteria of rice flour with desirable gelatinization and pasting properties. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据