4.3 Article

Endophytic Pseudomonas fluorescens Endo2 and Endo35 induce resistance in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) to the pathogen Macrophomina phaseolina

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT INTERACTIONS
卷 1, 期 3, 页码 135-143

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17429140600997309

关键词

Endophytic bacteria; induced systemic resistance; Pseudomonas fluorescens; Macrophomina phaseolina; black gram

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of endophytic Pseudomonas fluorescens isolates Endo2 and Endo35 on induced systemic disease protection against dry root rot of black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) caused by Macrophomina phaseolina was investigated under glasshouse conditions. When the bacterized black gram plants were inoculated with dry root rot pathogen, the activities of peroxidase (PO), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) were stimulated in addition to accumulation of phenolics and lignin. Activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) reached the maximum 24 h after pathogen challenge inoculation, whereas the activities of PO and PPO reached the maximum at 72 h and 48 h, respectively. Isoform analysis revealed that a unique PPO3 isozyme was induced in bacterized black gram tissues inoculated with the pathogen. Phenolics were found to accumulate in bacterized black gram tissues challenged with M. phaseolina one day after pathogen challenge. The accumulation of phenolics reached maximum at the third day after pathogen inoculation. Similar observation was found in the lignin content of black gram plants. In untreated control plants, the accumulation of defence enzymes and chemicals started at the first day and drastically decreased 3 days after pathogen inoculation. These results suggest that induction of defense enzymes involved in phenylpropanoid pathway and accumulation of phenolics and PR-proteins might have contributed to restricting invasion of Macrophomina phaseolina in black gram roots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据